Thursday, April 26, 2012

THEY DONT WANT TO FIGHT IN A FIGHTING GAME----RANKED LOBBY BACK OUT

THEY DONT WANT TO FIGHT IN A FIGHTING GAME----RANKED LOBBY BACK OUT..........
this is geting crazy in ufc 2010.......they back out if they see good stats.......IN A RANKED LOBBY
im 72 in the leaderboards 430-130..........340 subbmissions
i Won the 4 in the world......janitor, 1 tIme.....he beat me 10 but still will fight him next time....and evrybody

YOU MUST LOCK THE PLAYER IN THE RANKED LOBBY AFTER HE GETS IN
IF HE LEAVES THE LOBBY HE WILL GET PENALTY POINTS
THIS IS RANKED........IF YOU ARE NOT GOOD DONT GET IN...........|||Please don't make pointless threads you make one of these exact same threads every now and again about UFC Undisputed ranked matches in the EA MMA General Discussion.|||Maybe it is because you had a garbage connection? UFC 2010 is a peer to peer game. If you are hosting and the ping sucks, then why bother starting a game that will move like a slideshow or The Matrix?|||


Please don't make pointless threads you make one of these exact same threads every now and again about UFC Undisputed ranked matches in the EA MMA General Discussion.

I seriously dont know why you would post this here & not over at the Undisputed forums.|||


Maybe it is because you had a garbage connection? UFC 2010 is a peer to peer game. If you are hosting and the ping sucks, then why bother starting a game that will move like a slideshow or The Matrix?

I know this is off-topic, but UFC uses one of the WORST peer to peer systems in the known universe (If you don't know what I'm talking about, then you must not know much about networking). It has nothing to do with anyone's connection 99.9% of the time. The game is broken, which is why its sales dropped by 60% compared to last year.|||




Maybe it is because you had a garbage connection? UFC 2010 is a peer to peer game. If you are hosting and the ping sucks, then why bother starting a game that will move like a slideshow or The Matrix?

I know this is off-topic, but UFC uses one of the WORST peer to peer systems in the known universe (If you don't know what I'm talking about, then you must not know much about networking). It has nothing to do with anyone's connection 99.9% of the time. The game is broken, which is why its sales dropped by 60% compared to last year.

All that system does is match you up. Once you are matched up, the rest is up to your internet connection and the game's networking code|||






Maybe it is because you had a garbage connection? UFC 2010 is a peer to peer game. If you are hosting and the ping sucks, then why bother starting a game that will move like a slideshow or The Matrix?

I know this is off-topic, but UFC uses one of the WORST peer to peer systems in the known universe (If you don't know what I'm talking about, then you must not know much about networking). It has nothing to do with anyone's connection 99.9% of the time. The game is broken, which is why its sales dropped by 60% compared to last year.

All that system does is match you up. Once you are matched up, the rest is up to your internet connection and the game's networking code

Yeah, it connects you to awful internet connections and has caused many of the disconnect issues. It's the game's fault, hell even look at their forums. They've had a few stickied threads by one of their employees asking if there are connection problems.
On top of the horrible matchmaking, the networking code is broken and causes disconnects too.
Just all around a terrible online experience.
But that's not on topic, now is it?
I do believe that EA's games DO NOT show records and ranks before fights, so no more cherry pickers and panzies who won't fight you because of a 15-0 record.|||Why did you post this over here?|||


THEY DONT WANT TO FIGHT IN A FIGHTING GAME----RANKED LOBBY BACK OUT..........
this is geting crazy in ufc 2010.......they back out if they see good stats.......IN A RANKED LOBBY
im 72 in the leaderboards 430-130..........340 subbmissions.....

Heres your problem chester. Take away your sub wins and you're 90-130 which means you really suck and are one of those ppl who exploit the flaws in the ground game.|||Hey, hey, hey, this guy has a really good point.
My win/loss ratio WAS good then I gave up on UFC because of how unbalanced it was and started screwing around (Using Mostapha Al Turk against Brock Lesnar) until my win/loss ratio dropped to about 80 wins/40 losses. ALL my wins are KO/TKO, my internet connection is very fast and I only play with Connect Quality on so the ping bar is always green or full.
And people with good records still leave when they see mine. Why? Because my win/loss isn't negative. A lot of the guys with like 90 wins, 20 losses only play guys that has more losses than wins.
tl;dr, EA please don't post win/loss record in the lobby. Just post DNF and ping bar. If you post win/loss, then people will start ducking you unless you have more losses than wins.|||i would like it if we cant see others stats, but only ours. and then when we get into the fight we can see his stats|||Well I wouldn't have a problem with not seeing someones stats just as long as they pair you with someone who has just as many points as you do. Lets face it who here want to fight a guy who's 100-1 and you're 80-90 or something
Though generally I'm all for it if its fair and balanced. FNR4 does show your record though from what I can remember|||No they need to show the records like they always do so stat whores can be exposed. If you're one of those ppl that care DEEPLY about your record I want to know that before we fight so I can avoid the chesters.|||I finished UFC 2010 with a record of 126-14-1.
0 KO
5 TKO
120 Sub
1 Decision
1 draw|||


I finished UFC 2010 with a record of 126-14-1.
0 KO
5 TKO
120 Sub
1 Decision
1 draw

1)i highly doubt that
2)i highly doubt you even have this game
3)you cheated to get that record with sub switch glitching
4)no it doesn't take skill to subswitch

No comments:

Post a Comment